Silicon Valley start-ups, led by Anduril, are shaking up Lockheed and Boeing in the CCA drone market, redefining global military innovation.
Summary
Over the past three years, a quiet but profound shift has been taking place in the US defense industry. Start-ups from Silicon Valley are winning strategic contracts in the field of Collaborative Combat Aircraft, once the preserve of large, long-established manufacturers. Anduril, Shield AI, Kratos, and General Atomics are imposing faster innovation cycles, open software architectures, and controlled costs. In contrast, traditional “prime contractors” such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing are struggling to adapt their heavy industrial methods to agile, incremental programs. The Pentagon, faced with operational urgency and technological competition from China, is encouraging this change in model. This restructuring is not limited to the United States: it is influencing procurement doctrines, industrial alliances, and exports of autonomous systems. Defense is becoming a field where software culture is now as important as expertise in airframes or engines.
The context that opened the door to start-ups
The success of start-ups in the field of combat drones is no coincidence. It is part of a specific strategic context. The US Air Force and the Department of Defense are seeking to combine mass, acceptable attrition, and information superiority. Manned combat aircraft are becoming too expensive to produce in large numbers and too valuable to be systematically exposed.
CCA programs are based on a simple idea: relatively affordable drones capable of accompanying a piloted fighter, extending its sensors, or serving as remote effectors. Achieving this requires short development cycles, high software integration, and an acceptance of rapidly changing standards. This framework favors digital companies rather than groups structured around heavy industrial chains.
The Pentagon has also changed its procedures. OTA (Other Transaction Authority) contracts allow funding to be allocated without going through traditional tendering processes. This lever has been instrumental in attracting non-traditional players.
The central role of Anduril
Anduril has become the symbol of this transformation. Founded in 2017, the company has made a name for itself by taking a radically different approach. Its core value is not the aerial platform, but the software. The Lattice system, a true digital backbone, merges sensors, data, and command in real time.
In the field of UAVs, Anduril is developing several autonomous drone concepts designed to be produced quickly and adapted through software updates. The company touts unit costs that are much lower than those of traditional platforms, often cited as being in the range of a few million dollars per drone, compared to tens of millions for a piloted aircraft.
Anduril has won key contracts with the US Air Force and US Special Operations Command, notably for autonomous systems and command architectures. Its advantage lies in its ability to deliver operational prototypes in less than two years, where a typical cycle often exceeds five to seven years.
Other emerging players to watch
Anduril is not alone. Shield AI specializes in embedded autonomy and GPS-free navigation. Its Hivemind software is designed to enable drones to operate in contested environments saturated with jamming. This capability is directly aligned with the needs of CCAs operating against modern air defenses.
Kratos, although older, occupies an intermediate position between start-up and industrial player. Its XQ-58 Valkyrie drones served as a full-scale test bed for loyal wingman concepts. Kratos has been able to capitalize on a lighter structure than that of its historical competitors, while also offering real industrial experience.
General Atomics, known for its MALE drones, is also entering the UCAV field with a modular approach. The company combines aeronautical expertise with enhanced software integration, seeking to keep pace with new entrants.
These players share a common trait: a culture of incremental development, with successive versions deployed rapidly and continuously improved.
The structural limitations of established manufacturers
Faced with this dynamic, groups such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing find themselves in a delicate position. Their historical strength lies in their mastery of complex, certified programs that have been in production for several decades. This approach is perfectly suited to a piloted fighter jet, but much less so to a disposable drone.
Their internal organization, segmented by program, slows down the adoption of short cycles. Each modification goes through long validation chains, designed to minimize technical risk, but incompatible with rapid experimentation.
Cost is another factor. Bonuses are structured to manage programs worth tens of billions of dollars. Producing a deliberately “consumable” system at low cost calls into question their business models, which are based on long-term durability and logistical support.
This does not mean that these players are excluded. Lockheed Martin and Boeing are investing in digital architectures and forming partnerships with start-ups. But they are no longer the only ones setting the pace.
Technologies that make the difference
The superiority of start-ups does not come from a revolutionary cell. It is based on three technological pillars.
The first is embedded software. CCAs are designed as software-defined platforms. Navigation, cooperation, and decision-making algorithms are updated regularly, sometimes within a matter of weeks.
The second pillar is open architecture. Start-ups favor standards that allow new sensors or effectors to be integrated quickly. This approach reduces dependence on a single supplier and facilitates adaptation to operational needs.
The third is tactical autonomy. The goal is not a totally independent drone, but a system capable of operating with degraded links, making simple local decisions, and cooperating with other vectors.
These technological choices respond directly to the constraints of future high-intensity conflicts.
How these companies win contracts in the United States
The contractual success of start-ups is based on a close alignment with the Pentagon’s priorities. The US Air Force is looking for solutions that can be tested quickly, with flight demonstrations. Companies capable of presenting a working prototype gain a decisive advantage.
Initial contracts are often modest, in the tens of millions of dollars. But they serve as a springboard. Once the concept is validated, funding increases and volumes follow. This logic favors players capable of absorbing a rapid ramp-up.
Rhetoric also matters. Startups speak the language of operational urgency, strategic competition, and industrial resilience. They promise less perfection, but more availability.
An influence that extends beyond the United States
The impact of this transformation extends beyond the United States. Washington’s allies are closely watching these programs.
European and Asian air forces are interested in collaborative drones, not only to support American fighter jets, but also to supplement their own fleets.
American start-ups are benefiting from this ripple effect. Some are already negotiating industrial cooperation or indirect sales through joint programs. This dynamic reinforces American technological influence, but also raises questions of sovereignty for client countries.
Meanwhile, China and other powers are accelerating their own autonomous drone programs. Competition is no longer focused solely on the platform, but on the ability to rapidly industrialize adaptable systems.
A defense sector undergoing lasting restructuring
The rise of startups in the field of CCAs does not spell the end for large manufacturers. It marks a restructuring. Premiums continue to play a key role for complex platforms, engines, and heavy mission systems. New entrants bring agility and speed.
This coexistence is sometimes conflictual, sometimes complementary. It is forcing the entire sector to evolve. Defense is becoming an area where Silicon Valley culture is making a lasting impact, with all its strengths and excesses.
The real question, therefore, is not who will replace whom, but who will be able to combine industrial robustness with rapid innovation. In this equation, start-ups have proven that they are no longer mere outsiders, but key players in the air combat of tomorrow.
Sources
Department of Defense, budget documents and CCA programs
US Air Force, presentations on Collaborative Combat Aircraft
Congressional Research Service, reports on industrial defense innovation
Air & Space Forces Magazine, analyses on Anduril and new players
Defense News, reports on collaborative drones and military autonomy
Live a unique fighter jet experience