Technical analysis of air combat tactics, from maneuvering to engagement decisions, in modern fighter pilot missions.

Mastering airspace through tactical maneuvering

Air combat is a field where technology, human skill, and tactics come together in a form of high-speed direct confrontation. It is not just a duel between two fighter jets: it is a complex sequence of decisions, movements, sensor evaluations, and anticipations. From the visual confrontations of the two world wars to modern engagements in interconnected data bubbles, tactics have evolved radically.

The fighter pilot never acts alone. He maneuvers in a multidimensional, often networked environment, facing adversaries who are equally well equipped and trained. Air maneuvering follows principles of geometry, physics, and strategy. It depends not only on the aircraft’s airframe or the thrust of its turbojet engine, but above all on an understanding of opportunities for engagement and disengagement in a space where every mistake can be fatal.

This text examines tactical maneuvering as a fundamental tool of air combat: forms, techniques, applications, and operational realities. Drawing on factual data, it identifies the decisive levers that enable a fighter aircraft to gain the upper hand, avoid being shot down, or neutralize a threat.

The structure of air combat: geometry, speed, and initiative

Air combat is based on simple geometric principles: relative position, speed, altitude, and angle of attack. These are the basics of what Anglo-Saxons call a dogfight, a close-range confrontation. In this phase, maneuvering is mainly used to create a stable firing angle on the opponent while avoiding exposing oneself to one in return.

The engagement triangle comprises three zones:

• Offensive: the aircraft is behind the opponent, at an angle and distance compatible with launching a missile or opening fire with its cannons.
• Neutral: the aircraft are in symmetrical positions; the decision to maneuver is crucial.
• Defensive: the fighter is under threat and must avoid being shot while looking for an exit or a counterattack.

The initiative remains the central issue. Relative speed, expressed in meters per second, and the ability to change direction—turn radius, sustained turn rate—determine who controls the pace of the engagement. For example, an F-16C Block 50 can achieve a sustained turn rate of over 22 degrees/second, compared to 17 degrees/second for a Su-30MKI. These seemingly small differences can determine the outcome of a short-range engagement.

Altitude also influences air density, and therefore lift and drag. At an altitude of 9,000 meters, the performance of an air-to-air missile decreases significantly. A trained fighter pilot will therefore use the atmospheric layers to his advantage, maneuvering at low altitude to break the enemy’s radar range or at high altitude to benefit from kinetic energy before diving.

Geometry becomes dynamic. The pilot must think ahead, anticipating future relative positions and calculating the intersections of trajectories in three-dimensional space.

Offensive maneuvers: techniques, vectors, and limitations

Once the initial advantage has been gained, the objective is to exploit the offensive position. This requires precise management of energy (speed and altitude), load factor (in g), and weapon systems. The classic offensive maneuver is the vertical yo-yo, which involves climbing briefly to gain potential energy, then diving to convert that energy into speed and a favorable approach angle.

Modern maneuvers also include assisted afterburner figures such as the Pugachev Cobra or the Kulbit, made possible by vector thrust. The Su-35S is capable of changing its flight axis independently of its trajectory, offering extreme angles of attack. However, this capability remains controversial in a real-world context: the loss of energy associated with these maneuvers makes the aircraft vulnerable if the maneuver fails.

Modern piloting increasingly relies on the integration of sensors: AESA radar, infrared sensors, tactical data links (datalink). An aircraft such as the F-22 Raptor, despite its excellent maneuverability, favors beyond visual range (BVR) engagement with AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles, which can reach targets at distances of over 160 km, or nearly 87 nautical miles.

Thus, in 90% of cases recorded during engagements in Ukraine or the Middle East since 2014, shots were fired outside visual range. Air combat no longer relies solely on tight turns, but on managing detection, identification, and engagement distance. Maneuvering remains useful, but it is combined with a network-centric combat architecture.

Defensive maneuvering: survive, flee, reverse

Being targeted requires a sequence of precise reactions. Defensive maneuvering begins with threat detection via radar alerts or passive sensors. The first phase is evasion: abruptly changing course (energy drop), jamming thermal (flares) or electromagnetic (chaff) signals, and diving to low altitude if possible.

The most commonly used defensive maneuvers are:

• Break turn: a sharp turn at high load to get out of the firing angle.
• Split-S: a half barrel roll followed by a dive to break contact.
• High-G barrel roll: a rapid loop on the axis to saturate the enemy’s sights.

These actions must be calibrated according to the performance of the enemy’s sensors. An R-73 infrared missile can withstand a load factor of more than 12 g, whereas a human pilot rarely reaches 9 g for a prolonged period. The effectiveness of evasion therefore depends on a combination of maneuvers, decoys, and breaking the radar lock.

Some modern aircraft, such as the Dassault Rafale F4, are equipped with digital jammers (SPECTRA) capable of distorting the trajectory of incoming missiles. Combined with rapid maneuvering, these systems offer increased survival time. However, the risk remains constant in combat where sensory saturation is possible.

Finally, a well-executed defensive maneuver can lead to a posture reversal. If the attacker overshoots its target, the latter can regain the initiative. The best-known example is the scissors maneuver, where two aircraft begin crossing turns to swap their offensive and defensive positions at each half-turn.

Doctrinal evolution: networks, stealth, and algorithms

Air combat is no longer an isolated duel. It is integrated into a tactical ecosystem, where information flows in real time between fighters, radars, drones, and ground-to-air systems. Aircraft are becoming sensor nodes, capable of transmitting and exploiting data without turning on their own radar.

Modern doctrines are based on the concept of first look, first shoot, first kill. Aircraft such as the Chinese J-20, the American F-35 and the Russian Su-57 aim to achieve information superiority even before the maneuvering phase. Their radar stealth, combined with advanced connectivity, allows them to detect and engage without being detected.

Artificial intelligence is playing an increasing role in the analysis of tactical options. During USAF exercises, onboard AI was able to beat a human pilot in simulation in more than 90% of cases in close combat. Algorithmic anticipation of enemy behavior is changing the dynamics of tactical maneuvering, particularly in multi-aircraft combat scenarios.

Finally, the integration of so-called loyal wingman drones, or escort drones, is changing the traditional geometry of combat. These unmanned aircraft, such as the Australian MQ-28 Ghost Bat, allow sensors or offensive payloads to be deployed while complicating the enemy’s tactical analysis.

Modern air combat remains both a physical and cognitive discipline. Fighter pilots operate in an environment where decisions must be made instantly, the terrain must be understood dynamically, and the ability to anticipate an enemy response is essential.

Tactical maneuvering remains an essential skill, but it is now practiced in a context where sensors, long-range missiles, and electronic warfare are redefining engagement. Human experience remains decisive, but it is now accompanied by automated systems, rapid decision-making loops, and an airspace saturated with information.

Survival and superiority no longer depend on a single successful maneuver, but on comprehensive management of the tactical spectrum, from altitude to datalink latency to multi-source data fusion.

Get in touch to live a unique experience – fly a fighter jet – we fly in France AND YOU CAN TAKE THE CONTROLS!!!