The revision of the Military Planning Law marks a clear shift: the Eurodrone is scrapped, and the Rafale F5 takes center stage, featuring combat drones and a supersonic missile.
In Summary
On April 8, 2026, the Council of Ministers reviewed a major revision of the 2024-2030 Defense Planning Law. The political message is crystal clear: France wants to move faster, simplify processes, and enhance military effectiveness. The most visible decision is the abandonment of the Eurodrone, a European program deemed too cumbersome, too slow, and increasingly ill-suited for high-intensity conflict. Instead, Paris wants to focus on sovereign theater drones, which are less expensive and faster to deploy.
At the same time, combat aviation is becoming a priority. The Rafale F5 is the focus of these efforts, with a budget of approximately 3.4 billion euros over 2026–2030 to prepare for a leap in capability: the integration of a collaborative combat drone, a *new supersonic cruise missile * designed to neutralize air defenses and for anti-ship operations, as well as other weapons and sensors. Behind this decision lies a simple idea: France now believes that a sovereign, available, and relevant system is better than a large cooperative program that arrives too late.
The revision of the LPM makes one simple point: France wants immediately credible capabilities
The revision reviewed on April 8, 2026, is not limited to a few adjustments. It redefines a hierarchy of priorities. The government is adding €36 billion over the 2026–2030 period to the trajectory of the 2024–2030 LPM, bringing the total expenditure to approximately €449 billion over the entire period. The defense budget is set to rise to €57.1 billion in 2026 and then to €76.3 billion in 2030.
What matters, beyond the overall figure, is the rationale behind it. The war in Ukraine, saturation strikes, the rise of inexpensive drones, pressure on ammunition stocks, and the vulnerability of overly heavy systems have changed the way military procurement is approached. France no longer thinks solely in terms of prestigious industrial programs. It thinks in terms of survivability, mass, speed of deployment, and compatibility with high-intensity combat.
This is why the update to the Military Planning Law prioritizes ammunition, surface-to-air defense, anti-drone capabilities, deep strikes, and drones at all levels. The political message is clear: a system that arrives late, is expensive, and requires heavy infrastructure now has a much harder time surviving budget cuts.
The abandonment of the Eurodrone marks the end of a program that had become too burdensome for French needs
The case of the Eurodrone is telling. On paper,
the program made sense. It was intended to provide Europe with a sovereign MALE drone—that is, a medium-altitude, long-endurance drone—for intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and, potentially, attack missions. It brought together four nations: Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. The project aimed for 20 systems, representing more than 60 drones, with Airbus Defence and Space as the industrial prime contractor, alongside Dassault Aviation and Leonardo.
But between industrial logic and operational logic, the gap widened. The Eurodrone was designed to meet a need articulated in the 2010s. Yet the battlefield of 2026 is no longer that. A large MALE drone, with a heavy logistical footprint, useful in a permissive or semi-permissive environment, becomes far more questionable in the face of dense air defenses, electronic warfare, sensor proliferation, and the need to disperse assets.
The text updating the Military Planning Law clearly acknowledges this. The requirement for MALE drones is reoriented to take advantage of the emergence of lower-cost sovereign theater drones, with the Eurodrone being presented as * less suited to high-intensity*. This is not a rhetorical adjustment. It is an operational condemnation.
In other words, France believes it is no longer in its interest to fund a system that might have been relevant for counterinsurgency or prolonged surveillance theaters, but which is ill-suited for a confrontation against an adversary equipped with strong surface-to-air, jamming, and long-range strike capabilities. The judgment is harsh, but it is consistent with recent feedback.
France’s choice favors more rugged, numerous, and rapidly deployable drones
Abandoning the Eurodrone does not mean France is giving up on drones. Quite the opposite. It wants to buy more, but in a different way. The core of the strategy is to shift from a model based on a rare, highly sophisticated platform to one featuring a full range, spanning from small combatant drones to theater drones, all the way to collaborative combat drones.
The government has, in fact, highlighted some very telling figures. For 2026, orders for 10,000 FPV drones have been mentioned, with 5,000 expected as early as this year, demonstrating just how imperative mass production has become. This choice responds to a reality that Ukraine has made impossible to ignore: in a modern conflict, the drone is no longer an accessory. It has become a war consumable, a sensor, an effector, and sometimes all three at once.
France is therefore seeking to establish a sector for sovereign theater drones capable of being produced faster, adapted more quickly, and deployed without the massive support chain required by a large MALE drone. The key word is sovereign. It means freedom of operation, control over software, data links, payload, and production pace. It also means less dependence on a multinational program whose technical and scheduling compromises often end up diluting the initial need.
The Rafale F5 Becomes the Backbone of France’s Strategy
The clear winner of this decision is the Rafale F5. The revision of the Military Planning Law (LPM) makes this standard not merely a modernization, but a true operational breakthrough. The Ministry of the Armed Forces is allocating approximately 3.4 billion euros to it between 2026 -2030 for combat aviation, an amount that government communications have sometimes rounded up to 3.5 billion in their statements.
It is important to understand what the F5 is. It is not a slightly improved Rafale. It is an evolution designed to maintain the aircraft’s relevance in the face of tougher air defenses, longer engagement ranges, and the need for networked combat. Parliamentary and industry documents describe a mid-life upgrade featuring a new radar, an enhanced electronic warfare system, modernized optronic sensors, the integration of new weapons, and much greater interoperability with other platforms.
Above all, the F5 must prepare for the long term. The Rafale will remain at the heart of France’s air force through the 2040s and beyond. It must therefore remain credible against enemy systems that are also advancing. The ministry’s reasoning is as follows: rather than purchasing more aircraft of the current standard, it is better to invest in a version capable of opening a penetration corridor, commanding remote effectors, and participating in deep strikes.
The collaborative combat drone is set to give the Rafale a new tactical reach
One of the most important aspects concerns the collaborative combat drone. It is this drone that gives the F5 a new dimension. The idea is not merely to accompany a manned fighter with a drone. The idea is to create a partnership in which the Rafale directs the maneuver, assigns roles, delegates certain tasks, and reduces its own exposure.
This drone must build on the achievements of the nEUROn program and French research on autonomy with a human in the loop. It is designed as a stealthy, multi-purpose system capable of operating ahead of the Rafale in the most dangerous zones. In practical terms, it can serve as a scout, a relay, a jammer, a decoy, or even a weapons carrier. Its true value is simple: it allows the risk to be taken first rather than the piloted aircraft.
This is a doctrinal shift. Until now, air superiority has relied primarily on the performance of the manned platform and its missiles. In the future, it will also rely on the ability to deploy distributed, coordinated, and reconfigurable systems that complicate the adversary’s task. The Rafale F5 is therefore not just more powerful. It is designed to be the conductor of a more fragmented battle.
The timeline put forward by official sources places the entry into service of this new standard around 2035, with development already underway. This timeline is significant. It shows that Paris wants to avoid a capability gap between the current Rafale and the SCAF’s longer-term ambitions.
The new supersonic cruise missile reflects an obsession: destroying enemy defenses
The other major decision is the integration of a new supersonic cruise missile into the Rafale F5. The official text specifies that this will be a missile designed for the suppression of enemy air defenses—in other words, for SEAD missions—with anti-ship capabilities as well. This point is crucial.
France is acknowledging a long-standing limitation here: penetrating heavily defended airspace is becoming increasingly difficult, even with an excellent aircraft. To maintain the ability to strike first, it is necessary to be able to neutralize radars, surface-to-air batteries, command centers, and certain naval units from a distance—with speed, precision, and resilience against jamming.
The choice of a supersonic missile is not merely for show. It addresses an operational constraint. The faster the munition, the more it reduces the enemy’s reaction window. This does not make interception impossible, but it complicates the work of the defenses. In a SEAD mission, every second counts. A faster, better-connected, and harder-to-counter missile increases the chances of clearing the way for the rest of the force.
The announcement also signals that France wants to expand the Rafale’s capabilities. The F5 will not merely be an air-to-air missile carrier or a conventional strike platform. It must become a system capable of directly contributing to the disruption of an entire enemy network, from land to sea.
France’s expectations are clear, but they will only be credible under three conditions
Expectations for this shift are high. The first expectation is operational. Paris wants a combat aviation force capable of remaining relevant in a contested environment until the middle of the century. The second is industrial. The refocusing on sovereign programs must support France’s technological base, shorten decision-making loops, and reduce dependence on overly slow European compromises. The third is budgetary. By scrapping a program deemed inadequate, the government hopes to reallocate funds toward truly useful capabilities.
But we must not paint too rosy a picture. This reorientation also carries risks. Abandoning the Eurodrone further weakens European defense cooperation in a symbolic area. Relying on more agile national solutions is appealing, but it requires industrial execution without major delays. Finally, making the Rafale F5 the top priority demands simultaneously managing costs, timelines, and doctrinal coherence.
France’s gamble is therefore ambitious, but it has the merit of being consistent. The political leadership has looked at recent wars, observed what survives and what burns, and then made a decision. The Eurodrone embodied a respectable but outdated European response. The Rafale F5, its
collaborative combat drone, and its *supersonic cruise missile* embody a tougher, more offensive response—and, above all, one more aligned with the war as it is taking shape. Now comes the hardest part: turning a clear-headed decision into actual capability, delivered on time, at the right price, and without bureaucratic red tape.
Live a unique fighter jet experience