SNC offers Freedom, a twin-engine trainer aircraft that is more economical, sustainable, and better prepares future naval pilots than the T-45.
Sierra Nevada Corporation presents Freedom, a fully designed naval trainer aircraft powered by two Williams FJ44-4M engines. It promises a 16,000-hour airframe life, twice the planned requirement, a 40% lower life-cycle cost than the T-45, and 30-40% longer sorties. The aircraft can handle up to 35,000 touch-and-go or FCLP, offers maneuverability from -3 G to +8 G and a 27° angle of attack, with a modern cockpit reminiscent of the F-18 or F-35. SNC is also offering the complete digital suite to the Navy, a first in this type of contract.
General design and engines
The Freedom trainer aircraft is a clean-sheet design developed specifically to meet the requirements of the US Navy’s Undergraduate Jet Training System (UJTS). Unlike the single-engine T-45, Freedom is powered by two Williams FJ44-4M turbofans, engines that have been extensively proven—with more than 20 million cumulative flight hours worldwide, notably on business jets such as the Cessna Citation family. The twin-engine configuration provides increased safety in the event of engine failure, a crucial requirement for naval operations, while allowing for a lighter and more efficient airframe design.
This engine architecture also enables optimized fuel consumption and performance management. The Navy would benefit from a reliable, proven system, resulting in superior operational predictability while reducing maintenance and operating costs.
Airframe durability and serviceability
Freedom has an airframe life of 16,000 hours, which is twice the Navy requirement (approximately 8,000 hours), offering extended robustness. At this level, the aircraft is designed to withstand 35,000 touch-and-goes and/or Field Carrier Landing Practice (FCLP), in line with the intensive use of the naval training cycle. These figures reflect exceptional operational longevity, reducing unit costs per training hour.
Performance and maneuverability
Freedom is designed to reflect the characteristics of 4th and 5th generation aircraft, particularly in terms of critical maneuvers. It can withstand loads ranging from –3 G to +8 G, enabling a demanding training profile. The aircraft can reach a maximum angle of attack (AoA) of 27°, with a conservative margin compared to its actual capability (32°) to ensure stable flight qualities. This performance is achieved without reaching transonic or supersonic speeds, thus avoiding structural compromises—for example, the use of bulky fairings that generate high drag, requiring more powerful and therefore more fuel-intensive engines.
Freedom also features a trailing link landing gear, adapted to the constraints of naval ground training, and a modern cockpit providing a visual interface comparable to that of the F-18 or F-35. The wing features slats and flaperons, optimizing lift and agility.
Life cycle cost and sortie efficiency
Freedom promises a 40% lower overall life cycle cost than the T-45. In addition, sorties last 30 to 40% longer, increasing the training volume per flight. These gains are due to the reliability of the FJ44 engines, the durability of the airframe, and aerodynamic optimization, resulting in less maintenance, fewer spare parts, and better training hour productivity.
FCLP and realistic preparation
The Freedom jet is currently the only aircraft to offer FCLP capability up to touchdown (FCLP-to-touchdown), which is still required for naval training today. The US Navy recently considered abandoning this requirement in favor of virtual devices such as Magic Carpet, which poses a risk: future pilots may only experience carrier landing within their actual operational unit. Freedom, on the other hand, provides comprehensive training, replicating the workload and muscle memory essential for critical flight phases, especially in difficult conditions (e.g., nighttime, bad weather), where there is virtually no margin for error.
The ability to train naval pilots in this way, right up to the exact moment of impact with the deck, is a key factor in preventing costly and potentially dangerous accidents.
Data ownership and digital scalability
SNC offers to deliver the entire digital package for the aircraft to the Navy, including MBSE (Model-Based Systems Engineering) and CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) data. This is a first in a US defense contract, offering the buyer the possibility of carrying out upgrades, modifications, and updates themselves. This transparency provides long-term strategic technical flexibility, allowing the fleet to evolve without total dependence on the original supplier.
Challenges facing competitors
The UJTS is already highly competitive: Boeing offers a naval version of the T-7A Redhawk (developed digitally, despite recent challenges), Lockheed Martin/KAI offers the TF-50N, and Textron/Leonardo offers the Beechcraft M-346N. These options are based on existing platforms, which reduces development costs. However, none currently offer all the qualities touted by Freedom: double durability, FCLP-to-touchdown, proven twin engines, modern cockpit, open digital package, combat aircraft-like performance, and low cost of ownership.
Strategic implications and future training
If the Navy accepts the recent changes to the UJTS requirements—in particular the abandonment of FCLP—this could impact the quality of initial training and shift the burden to fleet replacement units (FRS). This would delay the operational entry of pilots and increase wear and tear on combat aircraft.
Freedom, with its technical advantages, offers more comprehensive training at a lower cost, better preparation for real combat, and reduced maintenance. Ultimately, the adoption of such an aircraft could lead to fewer accidents, better operational availability of forces, and enhanced industrial resilience through access to data.
Live a unique fighter jet experience