Without true stealth, the Eurofighter Typhoon relies on its sensors, weapons, and connectivity to remain credible before the arrival of FCAS and GCAP.
In summary
The Eurofighter Typhoon is facing a pivotal period. Designed in the 1990s, it excels in classic air superiority, but cannot compete with 5th generation stealth aircraft. Its architecture prevents it from achieving a reduced radar signature, which limits its capabilities in defended areas. To remain relevant, it is adopting an evolution strategy focused on advanced sensors, electronic warfare, and long-range missiles. This transformation aims to turn it into a connected “missile truck” rather than a stealth penetrator. The Typhoon now serves as a transition platform before the arrival of the future European FCAS and GCAP aircraft. It retains its place in export markets thanks to its versatility and controlled operating costs. However, its structural limitations remain decisive for high-intensity missions.
The Eurofighter faces competition dominated by stealth
The Eurofighter Typhoon occupies a paradoxical position. On the one hand, it remains one of the most capable European fighter aircraft, with high acceleration, remarkable agility, and a wide flight envelope. On the other hand, it suffers from a major constraint: it was never designed to be stealthy.
Its architecture—delta wing, canard tail, external hardpoints—reflects a philosophy focused on maneuverability. This configuration creates a large radar signature that is difficult to reduce without a complete redesign of the airframe. Even with absorbent materials, leading edge treatment, or certain geometric corrections, the Typhoon cannot compete with aircraft designed from the outset to reduce their radar cross-section.
In airspace saturated with multi-frequency radars, detection often occurs at distances of more than 150 km, placing the aircraft in a defensive position. The Typhoon remains effective in contexts where the threat is moderate, but its exposure in S-400 or HQ-9 zones severely limits its offensive role.
This reality presents the program with a sensitive question: how to maintain the operational credibility of an aircraft that cannot become stealthy when the international competition is dominated by the F-35, J-20, and Su-57?
Onboard technologies as a strategic lifeline
Unable to become invisible, the Eurofighter has chosen another path: to become an aircraft with an enhanced sensor system, capable of identifying and processing targets before being threatened.
The role of AESA radar
The new ECRS Mk2 AESA antenna offers a significant technological leap forward. It enables the aircraft to:
- track multiple targets simultaneously,
- detect aircraft at very long range,
- conduct offensive electronic warfare operations,
- collect passive data to reduce the fighter’s emissions.
These improvements limit the weaknesses associated with high radar signature, allowing the Typhoon to operate at a distance.
Enhanced electronic warfare
The modernized electronic warfare suite offers better protection against enemy radars and missiles. Directional jamming, spectral analysis, and automatic countermeasures are sometimes on par with those of newer aircraft. This package transforms the Typhoon into a platform capable of surviving in semi-contested environments.
The rise of long-range missiles
Its ability to carry the Meteor missile, equipped with a ramjet capable of reaching over Mach 4, gives it a real advantage in long-range air combat. Where stealth is lacking, the range of its weapons compensates.
The Typhoon then becomes a missile carrier, able to stay away from enemy defenses and fire from behind. This doctrine is now at the heart of its deployment strategy.
The Typhoon’s operational positioning compared to its competitors
Compared to the F-35, the gap is clear: stealth, native data fusion, unified avionics, and full NATO compatibility give the American fighter a significant advantage.
However, the Typhoon still has some advantages:
- excellent climb capability,
- a speed greater than Mach 2,
- exceptional maneuverability thanks to its high thrust-to-weight ratio,
- endurance in interception, which is appreciated for QRA missions.
In traditional air superiority scenarios, it remains highly competitive. But in modern warfare, where early detection determines the outcome of combat, stealth dominates.
The armed forces are therefore adjusting its role: the Typhoon is becoming an interceptor, air defense fighter, and long-range weapons carrier, accompanied by stealth aircraft capable of leading the way.
The future role of the Typhoon as an intermediate link before FCAS and GCAP
Europe is preparing two major programs: FCAS (France-Germany-Spain) and GCAP (United Kingdom-Italy-Japan). Their goal is to develop a 6th generation aircraft with deep stealth capabilities, cloud architecture, and advanced human-machine cooperation with escort drones.
These aircraft will not be operational until between 2040 and 2045. In the meantime, the Typhoon must ensure the continuity of air capabilities.
The Mid-Life Upgrade transforms the jet into a platform compatible with future standards:
- fully digital cockpit,
- multi-core data processing,
- liaison with loyal wingman drones,
- secure high-speed communication,
- integration into tactical cloud architectures.
The Typhoon thus serves as a transitional vehicle, essential for preserving industrial and military skills.
Opportunities in secondary markets and exports
The Eurofighter remains of real interest in several regions:
- countries seeking an alternative to the F-35,
- states that do not require total stealth,
- air forces that need a versatile fighter without dependence on the US,
- countries that already have Eurofighter infrastructure.
Its average operating cost, which is around 60% lower than that of some stealth aircraft, further enhances its appeal.
Fleets in the Middle East, Central Europe, and certain Asian nations remain natural targets. For these customers, the issue is not access to the most contested environments, but the robustness and availability of the aircraft.
The structural limitations of modernization without stealth
The modernization of the Typhoon improves its performance, but does not overcome its main handicap. Three limitations remain:
An impossible-to-reduce radar signature
Even modernized, the Typhoon remains an aircraft that is detected earlier than its stealthy adversaries.
Vulnerability to modern surface-to-air systems
When faced with long-range defenses such as the S-400, even a very fast aircraft must limit its exposure.
A significant upgrade cost
Modernization requires heavy budgets. Some countries may prefer to invest directly in a new-generation stealth aircraft rather than extending the life of an older model.
A path of adaptation, between utility and constraints
The Eurofighter Typhoon illustrates the dilemma of “4.5 generation” aircraft: high-performance, upgradeable, but structurally less suited to emerging threats. It may remain a key tool for:
- air defense,
- sovereignty missions,
- long-range strikes,
- deterrence in peacetime,
- transition to FCAS and GCAP.
However, its role in a high-intensity conflict will remain dependent on its ability to operate in a network, rather than on its own survivability.
Its future relevance will depend on how armies are able to integrate it into an environment dominated by stealth, drones, and multidomain warfare.
Sources
Eurofighter industry documents, 2024-2025 technical reports, F-35/Typhoon comparative analyses, European air defense assessments, public data on Meteor and ECRS Mk2, independent defense analyses.
Live a unique fighter jet experience