The USAF’s 2026 budget reduces the F-35A order and prioritizes combat drones, the B-21 Raider, and the F-47. A deliberate shift.
In summary
The US Air Force’s 2026 budget does not remove the F-35 from the equation. It puts it back in its place. The U.S. request for the USAF drops to 24 F-35As, down from 44 the previous year, while the modernization effort shifts toward three heavier priorities: the B-21 Raider, the future manned-unmanned combat system comprising the F-47 and Collaborative Combat Aircraft, and long-range munitions. This choice is not merely cosmetic. It reflects a reassessment of priorities in the face of China. Washington now considers that an additional tactical fighter does not provide the same value as a penetrating bomber, a collaborative combat drone, or a long-range strike architecture. The message is clear: the USAF wants less conventional tactical volume, more range, more autonomy, and more distributed mass. The F-35 remains central. But it is no longer the sole focal point of the future U.S. air force structure.
The 2026 budget marks a shift in strategy rather than a simple cut
The starting point is clear. The Department of the Air Force’s 2026 budget request totals $249.5 billion, of which $209.6 billion is for the U.S. Air Force alone. Within this total, the allocation structure shows where the focus now lies: $46.4 billion for R&D&E, $36.2 billion for procurement, $77.7 billion for operations and maintenance, and $44.5 billion for personnel. The most dramatic increase is in research and development, with a 39% jump at the Department of the Air Force level, according to the official briefing. This is the most significant sign. The USAF is not just buying equipment. It is attempting to change its combat architecture.
This shift should not be interpreted as an abandonment of manned aerial combat. It should be seen as a redistribution across three timeframes. The first is the present, with the availability of current fleets. The second is the 2030s, with the B-21 Raider and the first building blocks of the F-47. The third is the rise of a less costly and more distributed force thanks to collaborative combat drones. In this framework, the F-35 remains useful, but it ceases to be the automatic recipient of the bulk of the additional effort.
The decline in F-35A orders is clear and politically acknowledged
The most discussed figure is this one: the 2026 demand for the USAF calls for 24 F-35As, compared to 44 in 2025 in the Air Force’s procurement documents. The total cost requested for this line item amounts to $3.965 billion, with $410.2 million in advance procurement. The official document also specifies that these funds cover the aircraft, engines, and associated equipment necessary for production, delivery, squadron ramp-up, and logistical support. In other words, this is not a program shutdown. It is a deliberate slowdown.
This slowdown makes sense from both an industrial and technical standpoint. The Air Force’s budget briefing emphasizes that the F-35 must still secure its technological advantage through the combination of Tech Refresh-3 and Block 4. This means that the USAF does not simply want more aircraft. It wants upgraded aircraft that are more relevant and capable of incorporating planned advancements. Delays related to TR-3 have already had a ripple effect on deliveries and the credibility of the modernization schedule. Reuters noted in July 2025 that software and hardware delays continued to weigh on deliveries, to the point that the Pentagon was still withholding a portion of payments on delivered jets.
We must therefore be frank. The cut in F-35A purchases is not merely a doctrinal trade-off. It is also a message sent to Lockheed Martin and the entire program: the USAF no longer wants to stockpile airframes if the maturation of expected standards remains behind schedule. Buying fewer aircraft but pushing for meaningful modernization has become more rational than maintaining the previous pace without resolving the critical issues.
The B-21 Raider captures a decisive share of the modernization effort
The big silent winner of the 2026 budget is the B-21 Raider. The Department of the Air Force briefing highlights $11.3 billion for the B-21 program. In the Air Force’s Aircraft Procurement documents, the B-21 line item includes $4.689 billion for 2026 procurement, of which $2.590 billion is in discretionary appropriations and $2.099 billion is in mandatory appropriations from the reconciliation. Added to this is $862 million in advance procurement to safeguard delivery schedules and account for long industrial lead times. The document also specifies that low-rate production has already begun.
This decision comes as no surprise. Facing China, the USAF wants more than just a high-performance tactical fighter. It wants a long-range penetration capability that is survivable, capable of striking deep into enemy territory, and able to operate in a highly contested environment. The B-21 Raider directly addresses this need. It serves conventional deterrence, the nuclear component, first strike, the suppression of advanced defenses, and strategic pressure across the vast Indo-Pacific theater.
At this level, the bomber is not just another platform. It becomes a linchpin.
There is one often-overlooked point to add. The bomber provides range and payload capacity where tactical combat consumes significant amounts of air fuel, forward bases, and creates logistical vulnerabilities. For planning focused on the Pacific, this matters enormously. The 2026 budget does not say that the bomber replaces the fighter. It says that, in the hierarchy of investments, the bomber regains a priority it has not held at this level for a long time.
Combat drones are becoming a budget priority rather than a theoretical gamble
The second major shift concerns combat drones. The official briefing from the Department of the Air Force indicates that the 2026 budget allocates $4.3 billion to continue the development of the F-47 and Collaborative Combat Aircraft. This combined sum is essential. It shows that the USAF now views the team consisting of a 6th-generation fighter and collaborative drones as a single operational issue, rather than two separate programs.
This point is crucial to understanding the relative reduction in the F-35. The future U.S. model no longer relies solely on a high-end manned aircraft produced in large numbers. It relies on a combination: a more limited number of high-performance piloted platforms, supported by drones capable of carrying sensors, electronic warfare equipment, and missiles, or taking risks that would not be accepted for a manned aircraft. Reuters summed up this direction well in June 2025: the budget request places greater emphasis on high-tech missiles and drones, while reducing the focus on more traditional platforms like the F-35.
Let’s not beat around the bush. The mantra is not “the drone replaces the fighter.” The motto is more subtle and more challenging: drones enable the attainment of tactical mass at a cost and pace that manned fighters no longer allow. This is what the Americans call affordable mass. And this is exactly what the USAF is seeking to build in the face of an adversary capable of saturating the theater through the sheer number, range, and density of its defenses.
The breakdown of funding reveals very clear priorities
When we look at the breakdown, the picture becomes clear. On one hand, the budget document allocates $7.0 billion for the F-35, $3.0 billion for the F-15EX Eagle II, and $3.6 billion for the F-47. On the other hand, it allocates $11.3 billion for the B-21, $4.3 billion for the development of the F-47/CCA tandem, $4.3 billion also for long-range munitions and weapons related to the industrial base, and $656 million to begin procurement of the Family of Affordable Mass Missiles. This is not a scattered budget. It is a budget that simultaneously advances strategic depth, distributed mass, and strike capabilities.
The inclusion of the F-15EX in the equation is also telling. The briefing specifies that it serves to maintain the industrial base and preserve the defense infrastructure. The procurement documents even indicate a mandatory request for $2.409 billion for 21 F-15EX Lot 7 aircraft along with their associated requirements. Once again, the USAF is not opting for pure doctrinal elegance. It is choosing a combination of operational need, industrial continuity, and a realistic timeline.
In other words, the budget breakdown tells a simple story. The United States continues to purchase fighters, but it refuses to stake the bulk of the budget increase on a single tactical model. The money goes first to what increases range, survivability, strike depth, and the ability to generate mass.
The real priority is China, not the industrial comfort of the F-35 program
The best way to read this budget is geographically. The USAF is looking first to the Pacific. The Indo-Pacific theater presents immense distances, vulnerable bases, stretched supply chains, and increasingly dense air defenses. In this context, a budget dominated by additional purchases of tactical fighters no longer meets all needs. Stealth bombers, long-range missiles, collaborative drones, and a more distributed combat architecture are required. The Department of the Air Force’s official budget website explicitly states this: the 2026 budget is shaped by the need to keep pace with China’s military buildup.
This is also why R&D&T is increasing so sharply. Future wars will not be decided solely by the number of aircraft purchased this year. They will be decided by sensor integration, mission autonomy, networks, long-range weapons, resilience, and the ability to resupply quickly. The 2026 budget does not seek to maximize an immediate inventory of F-35s. It seeks to fund the backbone of a broader combat system.
The F-35 remains indispensable, but it is no longer untouchable
It would be wrong to conclude that the USAF is turning its back on the F-35A. The program remains at the heart of the U.S. tactical fleet. The budget briefing even emphasizes the need to secure the F-35’s technological advantage with Block 4 and TR-3. But the program’s status has changed. It is no longer protected by an automatic purchasing reflex. It now competes with other priorities that are more pressing and sometimes more fundamental.
This speaks volumes about the American mindset. The F-35 has long been presented as the near-universal backbone of Western air power. The 2026 budget tells a different story: a very good fighter jet is no longer enough. We also need stealth bombers, combat drones, mass-produced missiles, robust industrial supply chains, and development budgets capable of absorbing the next technological breakthrough. The F-35 remains a key component. But within the USAF hierarchy, it has once again become just one piece among many, and no longer the answer to everything.
This budget decision may still change in Congress. It may be challenged, amended, or partially rebalanced. But the direction being taken is already clear. The center of gravity is shifting. Less reliance on a single platform.
Greater emphasis on range, penetration, distributed mass, and deep strike capabilities. This is a severe blow to the F-35. Above all, it is a stark revelation of the wars Washington believes it must prepare for.
Sources
Department of the Air Force, FY26 President’s Budget Request, summary page and general breakdown of appropriations.
Department of the Air Force, FY26 Budget Request Summary Brief, overall amounts, priorities, F-35, F-47, B-21, CCA, munitions.
U.S. Air Force, FY26 Air Force Aircraft Procurement Vol. I, F-35A line: 24 aircraft and $3.965 billion.
U.S. Air Force, FY26 Air Force Aircraft Procurement Vol. I, B-21 Raider line: $4.689 billion in total procurement and $862 million in advance procurement.
U.S. Air Force, FY26 Air Force Aircraft Procurement Vol. I, F-15EX line: mandatory funding for 21 Lot 7 aircraft.
Reuters, June 26, 2025, general direction of the 2026 budget toward drones and missiles with a reduction in F-35s.
Reuters, July 14, 2025, F-35 deliveries and delays related to the TR-3.
Reuters, July 20, 2024, resumption of F-35 deliveries after delays related to the TR-3.
Live a unique fighter jet experience