A British parliamentary report highlights serious deficiencies in the fighter-bomber fleet (F-35B, Typhoon): availability, maintenance, logistics.
Summary
A report by the National Audit Office (NAO) published in 2025 and commented on by the UK Public Accounts Committee reveals that the British fighter-bomber fleet suffers from serious logistical and maintenance shortcomings. The fleet mainly comprises the 5th generation F-35B Lightning II and the 4th generation Eurofighter Typhoon multi-role aircraft. Despite cutting-edge technology, availability rates remain low, there are insufficient numbers of technicians and instructors, and certain essential capabilities (such as a standoff missile) will not be operational until the 2030s. Compared to neighboring European air fleets, the UK lacks both mass and “resilience.” The result is a capacity that is expected but not yet fully exploited. This article analyzes the state of the British fleet, identifies the main logistical and technical challenges, and then compares it to the practices and capabilities of other European nations.
The state of the British fleet
The UK’s fighter-bomber fleet is mainly based on two types of aircraft: the 5th generation F-35B and the 4th generation Typhoon.
According to the Commons Library report dated April 7, 2025, as of April 1, 2024, the Royal Air Force (RAF) had 137 Typhoons in service, divided into different age groups (Batch 1: 30 aircraft, Batch 2: 67, Batch 3: 40) and scheduled to remain in service until around 2040 for Batches 2 and 3.
For the F-35B, the NAO report of July 2025 indicates that the United Kingdom has committed to ordering 48 aircraft in a first phase, one of which was lost in 2021. The MoD plans to take delivery of these 48 aircraft by April 2026.
The report highlights that the British F-35 fleet is already “far superior” in terms of technological capability to any previous British aircraft, thanks to its stealth, sensor fusion, and information-sharing capabilities.
However, the article shows that while the equipment (the aircraft) is being modernized, logistical support, maintenance, crew and instructor training, and certain weapon capabilities remain behind schedule. For example, the NAO notes that the aircraft does not yet have an integrated standoff missile (the SPEAR 3 program is delayed until the 2030s).
Operational availability is a critical issue: according to Aviation Week, the British F-35 fleet has only achieved about one-third of its planned mission targets, highlighting a worrying availability rate.
As for the Typhoon, although it remains the “workhorse” of early warning and national defense, the Commons Library report notes that it lacks critical combat mass: “The RAF’s combat aircraft fleet now provides a boutique high capability: it lacks numerical depth and has an inadequate attrition reserve. “
Thus, the current situation presents a paradox: a technologically advanced fleet but weakened support chains and serious risks to long-term availability.
Logistical, maintenance, and personnel challenges
The shortcomings reveal several types of interrelated challenges.
Maintenance and availability
The NAO report notes that the absence of a sovereign Aircraft Signature Assessment Facility (ASAF) to verify that the F-35 retains its stealth capabilities has been postponed by the Ministry of Defense (MoD) in order to achieve short-term savings. This decision compromises the maintenance of stealth and long-term operational capability.
The delay in integrating standoff weapons also affects the need for software (Block 4) and hardware updates. The MoD anticipates that this integration will not be complete until the early 2030s.
Human resources and training
The report highlights a significant shortage of engineers, cyber specialists, maintenance technicians, pilots, and instructors. For example, in 2025, only 5 out of 16 instructor positions for the F-35 fleet were filled.
This shortage results in reduced flight hours for pilots, a longer maintenance cycle, and less mission readiness for aircraft.
Budgetary pressure and long-term planning
The report indicates that the life cycle cost of the British F-35 fleet has been revised upwards: initially estimated at around £18 billion for the first 48 aircraft, the NAO now estimates it at £57 billion, or even around £71 billion when personnel, fuel, and infrastructure are included.
The MoD is criticized for not including all the costs associated with long-term operational support in its estimate. The Public Accounts Committee points to a statement of “Full Operating Capability” (FOC) that it considers premature and based on subjective judgment.
Operational impact
The combination of these challenges reduces the “resilience” of the fleet: in the event of intensified operations or attrition, the ability to support prolonged or multiple missions is limited. The Commons Library report mentions that in a peer-on-peer conflict such as with Russia, every aircraft would count, and the UK does not have this sufficient mass.
Comparison with other European air fleets
To put the UK situation into perspective, it is useful to make a brief comparison with other major European fleets.
Quantity and availability
The Commons Library report notes that the UK has 137 Typhoons in service but no solid attrition reserve. In Germany, the Typhoon fleet comprises approximately 138 aircraft in service (as of 2025) for the Luftwaffe.
However, it is not just the number that matters, but also availability, maintenance, and the supply chain. Several European Typhoon users (including the UK) have suffered from the “cannibalization” of aircraft for spare parts, lengthening the time it takes to get them back online.
Modernization and armament
Comparatively, several European countries are investing in the rapid integration of modern weaponry into their fleets. The Typhoon, although entering service in 2003, continues to evolve.
The United Kingdom, despite being a major user, is criticized for the delay in integrating advanced weapons on the F-35 (and consequently on the entire fleet of fighter-bombers). Dependence on international supply chains, software updates, and constant maintenance makes the UK more vulnerable than some allies who have optimized their logistics around more homogeneous fleets.
Strategic choices and critical mass
The UK maintains two major types (Typhoon and F-35), which increases logistical complexity. Other countries operate a single main generation or have simpler modernization programs. The Commons Library report highlights that the UK lacks “air combat mass” in a context of increased European security.
Thus, despite a technologically advanced fleet, the combination of mass, availability, and logistical support falls short of certain European ambitions.
Industry and sovereignty
The UK’s industrial participation in the production of the F-35 is significant (approximately 15% of the value of each aircraft). This brings economic benefits, but also a strategic risk: internationally dependent support chains can limit the ability to operate autonomously. Other nations sometimes favor more sovereign or Euro-centric programs.
The comparison reveals that the UK suffers from an imbalance: strong technological capacity, but weak logistical resilience and insufficient operational mass.
Challenges and implications for deterrence capability
The challenges facing the UK’s fleet of fighter-bombers are not only technical or logistical: they have strategic implications.
Deterrence and the carrier strike role
The British F-35B is central to the concept of the Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers’ Carrier Strike Group. The lack of optimal availability compromises the UK’s ability to sustainably project a carrier-based strike force. The NAO report mentions that the FOC declaration scheduled for the end of 2025 may not be robust if it is based on temporary support from the overall program rather than on sustainable autonomy.
Alliance and interoperability
Within NATO, the UK’s ability to integrate its fighter-bombers into multinational deployments depends on their availability and maintenance. Low availability limits credibility and speed of response.
Risk of attrition and major conflict
The report states that in a peer-on-peer conflict, the quantity of aircraft available is as critical as their quality. The UK, with its so-called “boutique high capability” fleet, risks running out of reserves in the event of wear and tear or losses.
Industrial investment and future costs
Rising life-cycle costs (up to £71 billion for the F-35 fleet according to the NAO) require clear budgetary choices. Delays in investment in maintenance or infrastructure can lead to exponential costs. The postponement of the ASAF is an example of short-term savings that translate into higher long-term costs.
Technological choices for the future
The decision not to order more Typhoons immediately, but to focus on the F-35 and wait for the Tempest replacement program (late 2030s), raises the question of an intergenerational gap. The MoD must define how to maintain the current fleet with reliable support until this replacement.
Areas for improvement and recommendations
In light of the shortcomings identified, several avenues can be highlighted:
- Rapidly increase technical and instructor staffing levels to improve flight rates, aircraft availability, and pilot training.
- Invest in support infrastructure, including the signature facility (ASAF), maintenance facilities, and spare parts inventory.
- Clarify and accelerate the integration of standoff weapons (e.g., SPEAR 3) and software updates (Block 4) so that equipment is fully operational in a contested environment.
- Maintain a sufficient reserve of operational aircraft and avoid relying solely on the most advanced aircraft without any margin for maneuver.
- Take into account the entire life cycle in budgets, including personnel, fuel, and infrastructure, to avoid underestimations and future cost overruns.
- Improve long-term planning, ensuring that current capabilities remain effective until the arrival of the Tempest, and avoid a capability “gap.”
This analysis highlights that the British fighter-bomber fleet, although equipped with state-of-the-art equipment, faces logistical, human, and budgetary constraints that compromise its full effectiveness. In the face of contemporary strategic challenges, the ability to maintain and support the fleet is as essential as the quality of the aircraft themselves.
Live a unique fighter jet experience