Does the F-35B owe some of its technology to the Soviet Yak-141? A detailed look back at a little-known and often fantasized industrial heritage.
Summary
The idea of an F-35 with a “Russian heart” has been intriguing for years. The reason for this is the short takeoff and vertical landing version, the F-35B, whose pivoting nozzle is strongly reminiscent of that of the Yak-141, a Soviet prototype developed in the late 1980s. After the fall of the USSR, the Yakovlev design bureau did indeed sign an agreement with Lockheed Martin, including financial support and technical exchanges. This documented historical fact fuels the idea of direct technology transfer. The reality is more nuanced. The F-35B does not simply replicate the Soviet solution: it has been profoundly transformed, combined with a unique vertical fan system and integrated into a modern digital architecture. The Russian influence exists, but it is more a matter of targeted industrial inspiration than structural heritage. This case illustrates above all how the aerospace industry recycles, adapts and surpasses old concepts.
The persistent rumor of Russian DNA in the F-35
Since the F-35 entered service, one question has been asked repeatedly: how did the United States succeed where so many vertical takeoff programs have failed? For some observers, the answer lies in the Soviet Union, and more specifically in an almost forgotten aircraft, the Yak-141.
The argument is simple. The F-35B uses a 90-degree swivel nozzle for rear thrust. The Yak-141 already used a supersonic swivel nozzle. In the 1990s, Lockheed Martin collaborated with Russian manufacturer Yakovlev. For aviation enthusiasts, the conclusion seems obvious: the American flagship inherited Soviet know-how.
This interpretation is appealing. It is also partially accurate, but greatly simplified.
The Yak-141, a Soviet demonstrator ahead of its time
The Yak-141, known in the West as the “Freestyle,” was intended to replace the Yak-38 in the Soviet Navy. Its ambition was considerable: to become the first truly operational supersonic VTOL aircraft.
The prototype made its first vertical flight in 1987. In 1991, it reached Mach 1.7 in horizontal flight, a remarkable performance for a vertical takeoff aircraft. The heart of the system is a main engine with a three-axis rotary nozzle, capable of deflecting thrust while maintaining a certain level of efficiency at supersonic speeds.
But the Yak-141 suffered from major limitations. It also used two small vertical engines dedicated to takeoff, which were heavy, fuel-hungry, and useless in cruise mode. The program was costly. The end of the USSR brought its development to an abrupt halt. No aircraft ever entered service.
Technically speaking, the Yak-141 was not a failure. From an industrial and operational standpoint, it arrived too late.
The Yakovlev–Lockheed Martin collaboration after the fall of the USSR
In the early 1990s, the Russian aviation industry was in deep crisis. Design offices lacked funding. Engineers sought foreign partners in order to survive.
In 1991-1992, Lockheed Martin signed a cooperation agreement with Yakovlev. The official objective was to exchange information on VTOL technologies. In practice, Lockheed partially financed Yakovlev to the tune of several million dollars and gained access to data from the Yak-141.
This point is crucial: this was not a case of theft or clandestine transfer. The agreement was contractual, legal, and fully acknowledged. Yakovlev found it a financial lifeline. Lockheed found it a knowledge base of solutions that had already been tested in flight.
This type of agreement is not unusual in the aerospace industry, especially in times of geopolitical upheaval.
A common industrial practice but rarely publicized
Buying data, studies, or exploitation rights is nothing unusual.
Major aircraft manufacturers constantly analyze foreign programs, both civil and military. They buy patents, finance design offices, and recruit engineers.
In the 1990s, the context was unique. A great deal of Soviet expertise became available. The United States itself financed several cooperation programs to prevent the uncontrolled dispersion of sensitive skills.
In this context, the agreement with Yakovlev was as much about technology watch as it was about industrial diplomacy. Lockheed did not buy a turnkey aircraft. It bought accumulated experience on a specific problem: the management of hot flows and mechanical stresses in a steerable nozzle.
The fundamental difference between the Yak-141 and the F-35B
This is where the “copy-paste” theory falls apart. The F-35B does not replicate the architecture of the Yak-141. It adopts a radically different solution.
The Yak-141 is powered by one main engine and two auxiliary vertical engines. The F-35B uses a LiftFan, a vertical fan driven by the main engine shaft. This architecture, developed with Rolls-Royce, has no Soviet equivalent.
The F-35B’s nozzle, known as the “3BSM,” also pivots, but it works in tandem with the front fan and side control nozzles. The whole system is controlled by extremely sophisticated digital flight management.
In short, Lockheed retained the idea that a pivoting nozzle could operate at high speeds. It rejected the rest. The Yak-141 served as a proof of concept, not an industrial model.
Integration into the Joint Strike Fighter program
When the JSF program began in the 1990s, VTOL capability was a key requirement. The United Kingdom demanded a capability equivalent to the Harrier, but with a supersonic, stealth aircraft.
There had been many failures in the past. The Harrier worked, but remained subsonic. Previous American projects had all been abandoned. In this context, any flight-validated data was valuable.
Lockheed engineers therefore used the lessons learned from the Yak-141 to avoid certain pitfalls: thermal management, transition stability, mechanical stresses on the nozzle. However, the airframe, materials, propulsion, and avionics of the F-35B are entirely new.
Talking about Russian DNA is therefore excessive. It is more a case of conceptual hybridization, which is common in the history of aeronautics.
A debate amplified by geopolitical symbolism
The subject is also fascinating for symbolic reasons. The F-35 embodies Western technological superiority. Attributing Russian origins to it is seen by some as challenging this narrative.
Conversely, on the Russian side, the Yak-141 is sometimes presented as a misunderstood genius, plundered by the West. This interpretation serves national narratives, but it ignores the industrial reality of the F-35: a program that cost more than $400 billion, mobilized thousands of engineers, and incorporated technologies that did not exist in the 1980s.
The truth is more prosaic. Innovation is rarely pure. It is cumulative.
The F-35B: heir or successor?
To say that the F-35B “owes everything” to the Yak-141 is false. To say that it learned nothing from Soviet work is equally false. The Yak-141 showed that a supersonic swivel nozzle was possible. Lockheed demonstrated that it could be integrated into a stealth, digital, joint-service aircraft.
What sets the F-35 apart is not its nozzle, but its system integration. VTOL propulsion is only one subset of a much larger whole, dominated by software, sensor fusion, and predictive maintenance.
The real lesson lies elsewhere. Even the most iconic programs rely on legacy components, sometimes from yesterday’s adversaries. In military aviation, the line between inspiration, cooperation, and competition is often blurrier than we think.
Sources
– Historical data on the Yak-141 and the Yakovlev design bureau
– Lockheed Martin public communications on the JSF program
– Technical analyses of the F-35B‘s VTOL propulsion
– Historical works on the Yak-141
– Industry testimonials and specialized publications on Yakovlev‘s post-Soviet collaborations
Live a unique fighter jet experience