Northrop Grumman wins MUX TACAIR for the Marines and consolidates its power in SRM engines, key to US hypersonic defense.
Summary
Northrop Grumman has just secured a major contract from the US Marine Corps for the MUX TACAIR program, which aims to operationalize an autonomous loyal wingman based on Kratos’ XQ-58 Valkyrie. The announced amount is approximately $231.5 million, over 24 months, via an accelerated contract mechanism (OTA) tailored for rapid development and demonstrations in realistic conditions. For the Marines, the stakes are clear: increase the volume of available platforms, extend the range of sensors, offer electronic warfare options, and absorb risk in highly contested environments, while adhering to their expeditionary operations doctrine. At the same time, Northrop’s high valuation can also be explained by another pillar: its dominance in solid rocket motors (SRMs), which are essential for missile production and the rise of the US defense architecture, including in the face of hypersonic threats. This dual position, aerial autonomy + critical propulsion, places Northrop at the heart of the Pentagon’s industrial priorities.
The MUX TACAIR contract gives the Marines an operational boost
The highlight at the end of January was the selection of Northrop Grumman for the Marine Air-Ground Task Force Uncrewed Expeditionary Tactical Aircraft program, better known as MUX TACAIR. The contract, estimated at $231.5 million, is structured to last 24 months and aims at rapid prototyping, with a clear goal: to put into operational orbit a drone capable of flying “with” piloted aircraft, not just “beside” them.
The choice of the Northrop–Kratos tandem is not anecdotal. Kratos brings an already known vector, the XQ-58A Valkyrie. Northrop brings the building blocks that make the difference in modern warfare: autonomy, missionization, sensor integration, command and control, and “collaborative” deployment logic. The goal is not to build just another drone, but a system component.
For the US Marine Corps, this approach fits perfectly with a structural constraint: doing a lot with little, operating far away, and holding out in environments where aviation can no longer assume a “clean” sky.
The logic of the loyal wingman seen from the field, without fantasy
The term loyal wingman is often sold as a “robot co-pilot.” . This is an overly romanticized view. In reality, the loyal wingman is first and foremost a platform that allows for more tactical options without requiring more pilots.
In a penetration or air superiority mission, a piloted aircraft remains valuable and rare. It should not be exposed unnecessarily. The drone, on the other hand, can:
- go ahead and seek out enemy radar illumination,
- attract fire and trigger surface-to-air systems,
- extend tactical vision through remote sensors,
- serve as a data relay in a jammed area,
- play a role in electronic warfare or air-to-ground support.
The budget documents associated with the program explain that these systems are designed to improve lethality and support “stand-in” forces capable of engaging a powerful adversary while accepting constant pressure on the electromagnetic spectrum and airspace.
In other words, this is not a “parlor” drone. It is a tool designed to survive, or at least to last long enough to provide a decisive tactical service.
The performance of the XQ-58 Valkyrie and what it really changes
The XQ-58A Valkyrie is presented as an “affordable” and mass-producible platform, with an architecture compatible with an attrition strategy. Its known characteristics give a useful order of magnitude.
The drone is approximately 9.1 m long (30 ft) with a wingspan of 8.2 m (27 ft). Its maximum takeoff weight is given as around 2,722 kg (6,000 lb).
In terms of payload, it has approximately 272 kg of internal payload (600 lb) and 272 kg of external payload (600 lb), which allows for a combination of sensors, pods, and potentially effectors depending on the configuration.
The announced range is a key point. Sources mention a maximum range of approximately 5,556 km (3,000 nautical miles). This figure should always be taken with caution depending on the flight profile and payload, but it illustrates the idea: the Valkyrie is not a “short-range” drone . It is designed for distances compatible with Indo-Pacific scenarios and dispersed operations.
In terms of speed, open data indicates a cruising speed of around Mach 0.72. It is not a supersonic interceptor. That is not its role. Its value lies elsewhere: going far, staying in the zone, delivering effects, and returning if possible.
Finally, one detail matters a lot to the U.S. Marine Corps: flexibility of deployment. The Marines are looking for solutions that can work with austere bases, rapid deployments, and less cumbersome logistics than those of a fighter jet.
The direct impact on the U.S. military: volume, absorbed risk, pace
This contract is not just a budget line item. It structures an evolution in American tactical aviation.
The first benefit is volume. Western air forces have a growing problem: piloted aircraft are more efficient, but more expensive and fewer in number. The loyal wingman drone serves to “densify” a patrol. It adds sensors, presence, and potential saturation.
The second benefit is the risk absorbed. In a heavily defended area, it is preferable to lose a drone rather than a pilot, and especially rather than a strategic aircraft, the loss of which has a massive political and industrial cost.
The third benefit is pace. Autonomous drone programs are also a response to the pace of technology. A drone can be modified, reconfigured, and updated faster than a piloted fleet, which depends on long certification cycles.
And this is where a player like Northrop is well positioned: the company doesn’t just sell a “product,” it sells the ability to integrate into a combat architecture.
The integration of autonomy: the real qualitative leap in the program
The technological heart of the matter is useful autonomy. A loyal wingman drone does not need to be “aware.” It must be reliable.
Three capabilities are crucial:
- navigating and carrying out a mission without cognitive overload on the human side,
- managing degraded modes in the event of jamming or loss of link,
- understanding its place in a team, with a clear hierarchy.
This is precisely what the program seeks to industrialize: not “an autonomous drone,” but behaviors useful in collaborative combat. This includes very concrete functions such as trajectory management, avoidance, formation maintenance, route optimization, and the execution of simple actions on command.
The fact that the contract goes through an OTA structure is not an administrative detail. It reflects a desire for speed: test quickly, learn quickly, correct quickly, then industrialize.
Northrop’s SRM dominance, a decisive industrial lever for hypersonic defense
The second leg of the subject is less visible to the general public, but it carries a lot of weight in financial analysis: solid rocket motors.
SRMs are the “muscles” of most modern missiles. They provide initial acceleration, boost phases, and sometimes entire propulsion stages. Without SRMs in volume, there can be no large-scale missile production.
Northrop has consolidated this position since the acquisition of Orbital ATK, finalized in 2018, a transaction structured around $7.8 billion in cash and $1.4 billion in assumed debt. This operation strengthened its presence in solid propulsion, with a stake in American industrial sovereignty.
Since then, Northrop has announced heavy investments: more than $1 billion injected into its SRM capabilities over several years, with a stated goal of ramping up production. The company also mentions an expansion of its industrial footprint by approximately one million square feet, or nearly 92,900 m², to support propulsion.
This momentum is directly linked to the explosion in demand: air defense, tactical missiles, and above all, reinforced anti-missile architecture in the face of hypersonic threats.
Hypersonic technology: why SRMs remain central to the game
The word “hypersonic” often triggers shortcuts. Technically, Mach 5+ is a threshold, but the real challenge is maneuverability, trajectory, and the interception window.
To intercept a hypersonic threat, you need to:
- detect early,
- track continuously,
- launch quickly,
- accelerate hard,
- guide precisely,
- correct in the terminal phase.
In this chain, propulsion is extremely important. An interceptor must reach a rendezvous point in a very short time. Without acceleration, there is no intercept window. SRMs therefore remain a key component, even as guidance systems become more sophisticated.
This is also why tensions in the SRM supply chain are taken very seriously in the United States. The question is not only “can we design an interceptor?”, but “can we produce it quickly enough?”
The Pentagon has even taken an unprecedented step by announcing a direct investment of $1 billion in a missile engine-related entity, a sign that propulsion is becoming a critical industrial issue, almost on a par with a strategic resource.
High valuation because Northrop is positioned at two bottlenecks
Analysts are talking about a “high” valuation for one simple reason: Northrop is positioned at two modern bottlenecks.
The first is military autonomy. Everyone wants collaborative combat. Few players know how to integrate robust autonomy, missionize it, and make it compatible with operational doctrines.
The second is solid propulsion. Everyone wants more missiles, faster. Few players know how to produce SRMs at high rates of production, with the constraints of safety, quality, and certification.
In a context of increasing US demand for air and missile defense, this dual position gives Northrop structural value. Even if a drone program evolves, even if a schedule changes, SRMs remain necessary. And the race for hypersonic defense is a long-term driver.
What the MUX TACAIR program heralds for the next decade
The MUX TACAIR contract is a step, not an end goal. It heralds a lasting change in American combat aviation.
The future increasingly looks like a mix of:
- a core of piloted aircraft, highly efficient and very expensive,
- a ring of collaborative drones, more numerous and more flexible,
- an assumed attrition capacity to withstand modern defenses.
For the Marines, who must operate from advanced and sometimes isolated positions, the benefit is obvious: having a tool that extends range and reduces human risk.
For Northrop, the stakes are strategic: if the company becomes a key player in the “standard” loyal wingman market, it will lock in a market that is only going to grow. And if it maintains its SRM dominance at a time when the United States wants to double engine production rates, it will remain at the heart of industrial rearmament.
The deciding factor: effectiveness in a jammed environment
The ultimate test will not be a demonstration in clear skies. It will be the ability to operate in a space saturated with jamming, cyber threats, and countermeasures.
An autonomous drone only has military value if it can operate in degraded conditions. And a program has industrial value only if it moves from prototype to production batch, then to long-term support.
This is where Northrop is expected to deliver. The MUX TACAIR contract is a bet on a rapid transition to concrete results. And SRM propulsion is a bet on the US’s ability to produce “at the pace of modern warfare,” not at the pace of budget cycles.
Sources
DefenseScoop — “Marine Corps taps Northrop, Kratos for loyal wingman drone effort”
Northrop Grumman (official press release) — “Northrop Grumman to Rapidly Develop Marine Corps CCA with Kratos Valkyrie UAS”
Breaking Defense — “Northrop, Kratos team picked for Marine Corps drone wingmen”
The War Zone — “USMC XQ-58 Valkyrie development makes leap forward with new contract”
USNI News — “Northrop Grumman to advance Kratos XQ-58 Valkyrie drone for Marine Corps loyal wingman program”
DefenseScoop — “Marine Corps CCA/MUX TACAIR reflected in FY26 budget request”
U.S. Department of Defense — “2025 Marine Corps Aviation Plan” (PDF)
Northrop Grumman — “Solid Rocket Motors Propulsion: Boosting Production”
Northrop Grumman (official press release) — “U.S. Navy Selects Northrop Grumman for Second-Stage Solid Rocket Motor Program”
Financial Times — “Northrop Grumman’s valuation supported by solid rocket motor dominance”
U.S. Federal Trade Commission — “Northrop Grumman / Orbital ATK Matter”
Spaceflight Now — “Northrop Grumman completes Orbital ATK acquisition”
Kratos Defense — “XQ-58A Valkyrie (Product Sheet / Datasheet)”
Live a unique fighter jet experience