Reaching Mach 5 in the atmosphere seems simple on paper. In practice, heat, materials, and propulsion make hypersonic flight extremely risky.
In summary
Reaching Mach 5 in the atmosphere is not simply a matter of “faster than sound.” At Mach 5 and above, we are talking about hypersonic flight, a regime where the air itself changes behavior, where the slightest choice of shape or material is paid for in megawatts of heat and extreme mechanical stresses. A Mach 5 vehicle flies at around 6,000 km/h, sometimes at an altitude of less than 30 km. At these speeds, the problem of kinetic heating becomes central: the air compressed by shock waves reaches over 1,000°C at the nose, and local areas can exceed 2,000 to 2,500°C. Conventional metals melt, structures deform, and electronics suffer. Engineers must therefore rethink hypersonic aerodynamics, hypersonic material resistance, and propulsion. This is where hypersonic scramjet engines come into play: scramjets promise very high-speed propulsion without carrying oxidizer, but they require control of supersonic flows within the engine itself. The result is clear: the Mach 5 challenge is not just about pushing harder, it’s about surviving a few minutes in an environment that resembles the inside of an industrial furnace.
The Mach 5 challenge in very high-speed atmospheric flight
As soon as the speed exceeds Mach 5, we enter a regime that aerodynamicists classify as hypersonic. In concrete terms, Mach 5 in air corresponds to approximately 1,700 m/s, or nearly 6,100 km/h, depending on altitude and temperature. This is not just a question of numbers on a dial: the physics change completely. The kinetic energy of the vehicle explodes with the square of the speed. A two-ton missile traveling at Mach 5 carries as much energy as several hundred kilograms of explosives.
At these speeds, very high-speed flight is no longer just a matter of managing drag. Shock waves become dominant. In front of the nose, at the leading edges and around the wings, the air is brutally compressed. It heats up, its molecules vibrate, dissociate, and sometimes ionize. We are moving away from the comfort of classic ideal gas models. Recent studies show that at Mach 5 and an altitude of around 15 km, the total temperature of the flow can exceed 1,100 K, or around 830°C. In certain configurations, the local heat flux can reach 10 to 13 MW/m² in the most exposed areas. At this level, the lifespan of bare metal is measured in seconds.
Atmospheric flight at Mach 5 must therefore be thought of as a brutal compromise: flying high enough to reduce air density and drag, but not too high, due to the lack of oxygen for air-breathing engines. A typical profile for a hypersonic research vehicle, such as the X-51A, cruises at an altitude of around 18 to 25 km. Lower than that, the heating becomes unmanageable. Higher than that, air-breathing engines become inoperative.
This framework imposes radical mission choices. Current hypersonic weapons have very short flight profiles, in the order of a few minutes at Mach 5+, precisely to limit thermal exposure. And despite this, thermal protection remains one of the main factors in mass and cost.
Hypersonic aerodynamics and airflow control
Hypersonic aerodynamics has little in common with that of a commercial airliner. Subsonic and transonic “clean” shapes, with thin edges and rounded profiles, become dangerous. At Mach 5, a leading edge that is too thin reaches extreme temperatures, because the thermal diffusion distance is minimal and the heat flow is concentrated. This is why hypersonic vehicles often have blunt or even rounded noses, in order to shift the stagnation zone and distribute the heat flow over a larger surface area.
Controlling hypersonic airflows involves managing a forest of shock waves. Every change in geometry—nose, air intake, wing-fuselage connection—generates oblique or normal shocks that alter the pressure, temperature, and direction of the flow. Engineers use these shocks as tools: they position them to compress the air where needed, avoid destructive recirculation zones, or protect certain surfaces. But this “shock engineering” comes at a cost. A normal shock can multiply the local temperature by several factors.
Added to this is the problem of stability. At these speeds, the displacement of the center of pressure with Mach is brutal. An unstable vehicle requires powerful control surfaces, which means larger surfaces, which increase drag and heating. Hypersonic aerodynamics then becomes a search for balance between stability, control, and thermal survival.
Hypersonic wind tunnel tests remain rare and expensive. Test times are very short, sometimes only a few milliseconds. Data is therefore limited, making it necessary to rely on advanced numerical simulation with non-equilibrium chemistry models. This lack of “long-term” data explains why every hypersonic vehicle design program has its share of uncertainties, often discovered late in the flight.
Heat generated at hypersonic speeds and thermal stress on structures
The core of the problem remains the heat generated at hypersonic speeds. At Mach 5 and above, the question is no longer “how hot does it get?” but “how long can we accept this heat flux?” Measurements and simulations show that the heat flux at the stagnation point can exceed 4 MW/m² at Mach 5 for a blunt body, and reach more than 10 MW/m² on certain unfavorable geometries. By way of comparison, a conventional industrial furnace operates at around a few tens of kW/m².
This flow adds to the thermal stress on aeronautical structures. The vehicle’s skin heats up, but the internal structure remains cooler. The gradient can be several hundred degrees over a few centimeters. This causes differential expansion, buckling, and cracking. Fasteners, interfaces between different materials, and sharp corners are particularly vulnerable.
The problem of kinetic heating does not stop at the surface. The interior of the vehicle also concentrates heat: electronics, batteries, wiring, actuators. In a hypersonic weapon, these components must operate at skin temperatures above 1,000°C, with an internal environment stabilized at around a few dozen degrees. This requires thermal barriers, cooling circuits, and sometimes the use of fuel as a heat transfer fluid.
The duration of exposure is as important as the peak temperature. A warhead that remains at Mach 5 for 90 seconds suffers much less damage than a vehicle that attempts a 10-minute cruise at Mach 7. This is why most current systems opt for “punch” flight profiles rather than prolonged cruises. As long as the control of cooling for hypersonic vehicles remains partial, engineers limit the time spent in critical conditions.
The resistance of hypersonic materials and refractory materials technology
Faced with these heat flows, conventional metallic materials quickly reach their limits. Aluminum loses its mechanical properties well before 300°C. Titanium alloys hold up better, up to 600-700°C, but are still far from the 1,500°C observed on some leading edges. The resistance of hypersonic materials requires a whole new world of carbon composites and very high-temperature ceramics.
Today’s cutting-edge structures combine carbon-carbon (C/C) composites, matrix ceramics (CMC), and refractory materials technology. C/C, already used on the US space shuttle, can withstand temperatures above 1,600°C, but oxidizes rapidly in the presence of air. They must therefore be protected with ablative coatings or ceramic layers. UHTCs (Ultra-High Temperature Ceramics) such as hafnium or zirconium carbide can withstand temperatures above 2,000°C, or even 2,500°C for certain formulations, while remaining structural.
Carbon or SiC fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites (C/SiC, C/C-SiC) are being tested for leading edges and exposed surfaces. Their density remains acceptable for maneuverable vehicles. But they have their own weaknesses: microcracking under thermal shock, manufacturing difficulties, and high costs.
Oxidation management is another headache. A material that can withstand 2,000°C in an inert environment can degrade rapidly in the presence of oxygen and particles. This is why sacrificial, ablative coatings are used, which burn away while dissipating heat. This approach works for single-use warheads, but much less so for reusable vehicles.
In short, the strength of hypersonic materials is not a “secondary” issue. It is a key obstacle. Until we can master materials capable of withstanding repeated cycles at 2,000°C with little degradation, civil hypersonic aircraft projects will remain little more than PowerPoint slides.
The hypersonic super-statoréacteur and how scramjets work
Propulsion is the other half of the puzzle. Maintaining Mach 5 in the atmosphere requires considerable thrust, but also a system that can withstand the thermal stresses. Conventional turbojets have a ceiling of around Mach 2-3. Ramjets remain effective up to Mach 4-5, but become difficult to use beyond that point when the air is highly heated and compressed before combustion. This is where the hypersonic scramjet comes in.
Scramjets, strictly speaking, are supersonic combustion ramjets. The air is not slowed down to subsonic speed in the combustion chamber. It remains supersonic, typically Mach 2 to 3 in the channel. This configuration limits the rise in temperature and pressure before combustion, allowing the engine to remain operational at Mach 5, 7, or higher.
Air compression in scramjets is not achieved using compressors, but rather through the geometry of the vehicle and fuel injection. The oblique shocks at the inlet, followed by the shape of the channel, concentrate the air. The fuel—often hydrogen or a cooling hydrocarbon—is injected at very high speed. It must mix, ignite, and burn in a few milliseconds, while allowing the flow to remain supersonic. If combustion slows the flow too much, the duct is “throttled,” the flow becomes sonic and then subsonic, and the scramjet stalls.
Demonstrators such as the X-43A and X-51A have shown the feasibility of this hypersonic ramjet propulsion, with peaks of Mach 7-8 over a few tens of seconds. Missile programs such as HAWC and HACM are based on these advances. But let’s be honest: the development of scramjet engines is still in its infancy. The operating range is narrow, sensitivity to entry conditions is enormous, and precise control of combustion in supersonic flow is far from trivial.
Beyond combustion, these engines must also serve as radiators. Fuel circulates through the walls to absorb heat before being injected. The propulsion system is thus used as a cooling loop, at the cost of additional constraints on fuel chemistry and circuit design.
Operational prospects and limitations of hypersonic flight
This overview clearly shows that the Mach 5 challenge is not just a question of engines or wing profiles. It is a combination of constraints that reinforce each other: the faster you go, the more the heat increases, the more the materials are pushed to their limits, and the more the operating window shrinks.
The military accepts these constraints because the tactical gain is obvious. A missile flying at Mach 5-8 drastically reduces the opponent’s reaction time, complicates defense, and allows for unpredictable flight profiles. For a single-use weapon, it is possible to sacrifice part of the structure and use expensive materials.
For a hypersonic transport aircraft or a reusable vehicle, the requirements are much tougher. Safety, reliability, and maintenance must be guaranteed, while costs must be kept under control. As long as the design of a reusable hypersonic vehicle requires exotic materials, heavy thermal protection, and engines at the limits of stability, the economic model will remain unstable.
The most realistic path in the short term remains that of military systems or experimental platforms, with relatively short, highly specialized flights. Commercial aviation, on the other hand, will continue to operate below the hypersonic barrier for a long time to come. Not because of a lack of ambition, but because physics cannot be negotiated. Mach 5 is a threshold that can be crossed briefly. Maintaining it for a long time, in a profitable manner, is another story.
Sources
NASA – Stagnation Temperature and Hypersonic Heating
NASA / USAF – X-51A Waverider fact sheet
DARPA – Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC)
Recent scientific articles on UHTC materials and C/SiC and C/C-SiC composites
Specialized publications on heat flux in hypersonic regimes and thermal protection technologies
Live a unique fighter jet experience