
Why do some European countries prefer the F-35 to the Rafale?
21 June 2025
Rafale fuselage: Dassault sets up production in India
25 June 2025Maneuverability, cost, maintenance: the F-16 remains the preferred choice of some pilots over more modern fighter jets such as the F-35 or the Rafale.
An old aircraft that is still relevant
Designed in the 1970s, the F-16 Fighting Falcon should, in theory, no longer be on the list of the most widely used fighter jets. However, fifty years after its maiden flight, it remains one of the most exported and most flown aircraft in the world. More than 4,600 have been produced, and the latest version—the F-16 Block 70/72—is still being ordered by many countries, including Bulgaria, Morocco, Slovakia, and Jordan. Some pilots even prefer it to newer platforms such as the F-35A Lightning II, the Gripen E, and the Rafale F4.
This choice may come as a surprise. The F-16 is not stealthy, its connectivity remains limited despite updates, and its airframe is less upgradeable than that of so-called fifth-generation aircraft. However, some users consider that its flight qualities, ease of maintenance, and low operating costs make it a highly effective operational platform for many types of missions.
An intuitive cockpit and renowned maneuverability
A flying experience that some pilots consider unmatched
The F-16 is often cited for its flying qualities. From the outset, it was designed around the “pilot first” concept, with an optimized center of gravity, a side stick, and a 30-degree seat angle to reduce fatigue during high-load flight.
The F-16’s maneuverability remains one of the best in its class. It can withstand load factors of up to +9 g, with immediate responsiveness thanks to a thrust-to-weight ratio close to 1:1 (on light versions with low external load). The General Electric F110-GE-129 or Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 engine, depending on the version, delivers more than 130 kN of thrust, enabling a climb rate of over 250 meters/second.
This ability to respond immediately to commands continues to appeal to some pilots trained on newer aircraft. Several testimonials from USAF squadrons and pilots contracted to Lockheed Martin indicate that the F-16 offers direct flying sensations, without excessive corrective software assistance. On an F-35, the flight system filters commands more and prioritizes stability over responsiveness.
In close combat or short-range air superiority missions, this maneuverability remains an asset. Although the F-16 is less effective in detection or stealth, its pure agility in dogfights remains relevant, particularly in low-altitude interception or close air defense scenarios.
Significantly lower operating costs than newer aircraft
A budgetary rationale accepted by many operators
Cost is a key factor in the choice of a fighter aircraft, not only in terms of purchase price but also in terms of maintenance. The F-16 has a cost per flight hour of between €6,000 and €9,000, depending on the version and operating conditions. By comparison, the F-35A exceeds €26,000 per flight hour, which is almost three to four times more.
This difference can be explained by the simpler design of the F-16: single engine, proven airframe, logistics already amortized in more than 25 countries, parts available in large quantities, and technical documentation available for decades. In addition, the modernization of many F-16s through the MLU (Mid-Life Upgrade) program allows for the integration of AESA radar, advanced data links (Link 16), and a digital cockpit without overhauling the mechanical architecture.
The acquisition cost is also lower. A new F-16 Block 70 sells for between €65 and €75 million, while an F-35A costs over €100 million once equipped, with longer delivery times and more expensive technical support.
In countries with limited defense budgets, this represents an investment differential of more than 35%, which can be reinvested in operational maintenance, pilot training, or the purchase of ammunition.
Countries such as Egypt, Pakistan, and Taiwan still favor the F-16 for these reasons, despite strong strategic pressure, because it allows them to maintain credible capability at a sustainable cost.
Proven maintenance and an international logistics network
The most robust support chain in the single-engine segment
The F-16 benefits from more than 40 years of operational and maintenance experience. This long service life has resulted in a dense logistics ecosystem, with MRO (maintenance, repair, overhaul) centers available on several continents. Most technicians serving in NATO forces or partner countries have received partial or complete training on the F-16.
The availability rate of this fighter aircraft is generally above 75%, compared to 55-65% for the F-35A, according to recent reports from the US GAO. This reliability stems from its modular design, the absence of technologies that are overly sensitive to the environment (little stealth paint, less complex onboard electronics) and the ability to operate from short or austere runways.
The absence of sophisticated stealth coatings, such as those found on the F-22 or F-35, also facilitates operations in dusty or humid environments. Daily maintenance, post-flight inspections, and critical parts replacement can be carried out with standard tools, without clean rooms or specific infrastructure.
For air forces with few advanced technical bases, this is a considerable advantage. It allows fighter aircraft to be flown independently, without permanent dependence on a manufacturer.


A tactical balance suited to asymmetric conflicts
A platform that remains effective in today’s engagements
The F-16 is not stealthy, but it can strike fast, far and with precision. With a maximum payload of 7,700 kg, it can carry a wide range of air-to-ground and air-to-air munitions: JDAM, GBU-12, AGM-88 HARM, AIM-120C, etc. This enables it to act as a platform for interdiction, SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) or interception patrols.
The F-16 remains effective in asymmetric or low-tech conflicts. Air campaigns conducted by Turkey in Syria, Egypt in the Sinai, and Israel against targets in urban areas demonstrate the operational utility of a maneuverable, versatile aircraft capable of multiple sorties.
Even in more advanced contexts, such as Taiwan’s air defense against Chinese incursions, the F-16 V (Viper version) now features AN/APG-83 AESA radar, an advanced electronic warfare suite, and comprehensive multirole capabilities. It can therefore operate in degraded environments, with a reduced cognitive load for the pilot thanks to a modern cockpit.
Admittedly, it would be at a disadvantage in BVR (Beyond Visual Range) against a Su-57 or J-20, but in most real tactical engagements, the F-16 remains relevant as long as the opponent does not have absolute superiority.
Get in touch to live a unique fighter jet experience – we fly in France AND YOU CAN TAKE THE CONTROLS!!!